Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Open ; 13(5): e063922, 2023 05 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37169498

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to explore the acceptance and opinions of general practitioners (GPs) on the use of procalcitonin point-of-care and lung ultrasonography for managing patients with lower respiratory tract infections in primary care. We suppose that there are several factors that can influence the physician's antibiotic prescribing decision, and the implementation of a new tool will only be possible when it can be inserted into the physician's daily practice, helping him/her in the decision-making process. DESIGN: Semistructured interviews; data analysis using the grounded theory method. SETTING: Lausanne, Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: 12 GPs who participated in the randomised clinical trial UltraPro, which evaluated the impact of the use of procalcitonin only or an algorithm combining procalcitonin and lung ultrasonography on antibiotic prescription. RESULTS: GPs had mostly positive attitudes towards the use of point-of-care procalcitonin in lower respiratory tract infections and uncertainties regarding the usefulness of ultrasonography. Physicians' prescribing decisions result from interactions between three kinds of TrustS (core category): 'self-confidence', 'trust in the results' and 'trust in the doctor-patient relationship'. Procalcitonin reinforced the three levels of trust, while ultrasonography only strengthened the physician-patient relationship. To facilitate implementation of procalcitonin, physicians pointed out the need of coverage by insurance and of clear guidelines describing the targeted patient population. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that there is a preference for the implementation of procalcitonin rather than lung ultrasonography for the management of patients with lower respiratory tract infections in primary care. Coverage by insurance plans and updated guidelines are prerequisite to the successful implementation of procalcitonin testing in primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03191071.


Assuntos
Clínicos Gerais , Infecções Respiratórias , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pró-Calcitonina , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Relações Médico-Paciente , Testes Imediatos , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Ultrassonografia , Pulmão , Padrões de Prática Médica
2.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 12(3)2023 Mar 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36978363

RESUMO

Guidelines recommend chest X-rays (CXRs) to diagnose pneumonia and guide antibiotic treatment. This study aimed to identify clinical predictors of pneumonia that are visible on a chest X-ray (CXR+) which could support ruling out pneumonia and avoiding unnecessary CXRs, including oxygen saturation. A secondary analysis was performed in a clinical trial that included patients with suspected pneumonia in Swiss primary care. CXRs were reviewed by two radiologists. We evaluated the association between clinical signs (heart rate > 100/min, respiratory rate ≥ 24/min, temperature ≥ 37.8 °C, abnormal auscultation, and oxygen saturation < 95%) and CXR+ using multivariate analysis. We also calculated the diagnostic performance of the associated clinical signs combined in a clinical decision rule (CDR), as well as a CDR derived from a large meta-analysis (at least one of the following: heart rate > 100/min, respiratory rate ≥ 24/min, temperature ≥ 37.8 °C, or abnormal auscultation). Out of 469 patients from the initial trial, 107 had a CXR and were included in this study. Of these, 26 (24%) had a CXR+. We found that temperature and oxygen saturation were associated with CXR+. A CDR based on the presence of either temperature ≥ 37.8 °C and/or an oxygen saturation level < 95% had a sensitivity of 69% and a negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.45. The CDR from the meta-analysis had a sensitivity of 92% and an LR- of 0.37. The addition of saturation < 95% to this CDR increased the sensitivity (96%) and decreased the LR- (0.21). In conclusion, this study suggests that pulse oximetry could be added to a simple CDR to decrease the probability of pneumonia to an acceptable level and avoid unnecessary CXRs.

3.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 12(2)2023 Feb 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36830288

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in primary care are a promising target for antibiotic stewardship. A clinical trial in Switzerland showed a large decrease in antibiotic prescriptions with procalcitonin guidance (cut-off < 0.25 µg/L) compared with usual care. However, one-third of patients with low procalcitonin at baseline received antibiotics by day 28. AIM: To explore the factors associated with the overruling of initial procalcitonin guidance. DESIGN AND SETTING: Secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial in which patients with an LRTI were included. METHOD: Using the characteristics of patients, their disease, and general practitioners (GPs), we conducted a multivariate logistic regression, adjusted for clustering. RESULTS: Ninety-five out of 301 (32%) patients with low procalcitonin received antibiotics by day 28. Factors associated with an overruling of procalcitonin guidance were: a history of chest pain (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.81, 95% confidence interval 1.03-3.17); a prescription of chest X-ray by the GP (aOR 4.65, 2.32-9.34); a C-reactive protein measured retrospectively above 100 mg/L (aOR 7.48, 2.34-23.93, reference ≤ 20 mg/L); the location of the GP practice in an urban setting (aOR 2.27, 1.18-4.37); and the GP's number of years of experience (aOR per year 1.05, 1.01-1.09). CONCLUSIONS: Overruling of procalcitonin guidance was associated with GPs' socio-demographic characteristics, pointing to the general behavioral problem of overprescription by physicians. Continuous medical education and communication training might support the successful implementation of procalcitonin point-of-care tests aimed at antibiotic stewardship.

4.
Rev Med Suisse ; 18(781): 948-952, 2022 May 11.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35543687

RESUMO

Lower respiratory tract infections are a frequent cause of excessive antibiotic prescription. The use of CRP and PCT has been evaluated by recent trials as a mean to assist antibiotic prescription. These studies suggest a safe reduction of antibiotic usage when prescription is guided by biomarkers. There is at the moment no evidence benefiting one of the biomarkers over the other, but a recent Swiss trial could suggest an added benefit for PCT. For now, PCT is less available, more expensive and not reimbursed. Democratization of its use, and/or clear thresholds for the use of CRP are additional ways that could participate to reduce excessive antibiotic prescription in primary care.


Les infections respiratoires basses sont une cause fréquente de prescription inappropriée d'antibiotiques en médecine de famille. L'utilisation de la CRP et de la procalcitonine (PCT) a été évaluée par plusieurs études comme moyen de guider la prescription d'antibiotiques. Ces études suggèrent une diminution sûre de la prescription lorsque l'utilisation est guidée par des biomarqueurs. Il n'y a pour l'instant pas d'évidence en faveur d'une supériorité d'un biomarqueur mais une étude suisse pourrait suggérer un effet additionnel de la PCT. Pour l'instant, elle est moins facilement accessible, plus chère et non remboursée. La démocratisation de son utilisation et/ou la définition de seuils clairs pour l'utilisation de la CRP pourraient aider à diminuer la prescription excessive d'antibiotiques en ambulatoire.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas , Infecções Respiratórias , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Biomarcadores , Humanos , Prescrições , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico
5.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 39, 2022 Jan 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34991507

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate antibiotics use in lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) is a major contributor to resistance. We aimed to design an algorithm based on clinical signs and host biomarkers to identify bacterial community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) among patients with LRTI. METHODS: Participants with LRTI were selected in a prospective cohort of febrile (≥ 38 °C) adults presenting to outpatient clinics in Dar es Salaam. Participants underwent chest X-ray, multiplex PCR for respiratory pathogens, and measurements of 13 biomarkers. We evaluated the predictive accuracy of clinical signs and biomarkers using logistic regression and classification and regression tree analysis. RESULTS: Of 110 patients with LRTI, 17 had bacterial CAP. Procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and soluble triggering receptor expressed by myeloid cells-1 (sTREM-1) showed an excellent predictive accuracy to identify bacterial CAP (AUROC 0.88, 95%CI 0.78-0.98; 0.84, 0.72-0.99; 0.83, 0.74-0.92, respectively). Combining respiratory rate with PCT or IL-6 significantly improved the model compared to respiratory rate alone (p = 0.006, p = 0.033, respectively). An algorithm with respiratory rate (≥ 32/min) and PCT (≥ 0.25 µg/L) had 94% sensitivity and 82% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: PCT, IL-6 and sTREM-1 had an excellent predictive accuracy in differentiating bacterial CAP from other LRTIs. An algorithm combining respiratory rate and PCT displayed even better performance in this sub-Sahara African setting.


Assuntos
Pneumonia Bacteriana , Infecções Respiratórias , Algoritmos , Biomarcadores , Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Humanos , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Pneumonia Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Tanzânia
6.
Sex Transm Infect ; 98(2): 143-149, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34544889

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Women and girls are relatively under-represented across the HIV treatment cascade. Two conditions unique to women, pregnancy and cervical cancer/dysplasia, share a common acquisition mode with HIV. This scoping review aimed to explore HIV testing practices in voluntary termination of pregnancy (TOP) and colposcopy services. METHODS: The scoping review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. We searched articles published up to 20 December 2020 using three electronic databases (PubMed/Medline, Embase, Google Scholar) and including the keywords "HIV Testing", "Abortion, Induced", "Colposcopy", "HIV screen*" and "termination of pregnancy". RESULTS: A total of 1496 articles were identified, of which 55 met the inclusion criteria. We included studies providing background HIV prevalence in addition to prevalence in the study population and studies of women seeking TOP rather than presenting with TOP complications. This limited our review to high-income, low HIV prevalence settings. We observed two study phases: studies pre-antiretroviral therapy (ART) using unlinked anonymous testing data and examining HIV risk factors associated with positive HIV tests and studies post-ART using routine testing data and exploring HIV testing uptake. HIV prevalence was estimated at >0.2% in most TOP settings and >1% (range 1.7%-11.4%) in colposcopy services. Many TOP providers did not have local HIV testing policies and HIV testing was not mentioned in many specialist guidelines. Testing uptake was 49%-96% in TOP and 23%-75% in colposcopy services. CONCLUSION: Given the estimated HIV prevalence of >0.1% among women attending TOP and colposcopy services, HIV testing would be economically feasible to perform in high-income settings. Explicit testing policies are frequently lacking in these two settings, both at the local level and in specialist guidelines. Offering HIV testing regardless of risk factors could normalise testing, reduce late HIV presentation and create an opportunity for preventive counselling.


Assuntos
Aborto Induzido , Colposcopia/métodos , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Teste de HIV/normas , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Colposcopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Teste de HIV/métodos , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Gravidez
7.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 28(4): 558-563, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34826618

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the impact of the 10th version of European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints table, where most antipseudomonal drugs but meropenem are now categorised as "Susceptible, increased exposure" and labelled I, on meropenem prescription for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. METHODS: In this retrospective single-centre observational study, we analysed antimicrobial therapies prescribed after susceptibility testing in all consecutive adult patients treated for P. aeruginosa infections between 01.08.2019 and 30.07.2020 in Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland. We collected epidemiological, microbiological, clinical data, antimicrobial therapy, and infectious diseases specialists (IDs) consultations' data. The primary outcome was the prescription of meropenem to treat P. aeruginosa infections after release of susceptibility testing results. Secondary outcomes were: the use of increased dosage for non-meropenem anti-pseudomonal drugs, and IDs' consultations rates after susceptibility testing was made available. RESULTS: Among the 264 patients included, 40 (15.2%) received meropenem, 3.4% (5/148) before EUCAST update versus 30.2% (35/116) after (p < 0.001). Supervision and counselling from IDs and the use of increased dosages of non-carbapenem antibiotics also increased respectively (40.5% (60/148) vs 62.9% (73/116), P < 0.001); (55.5% (76/148) vs 88.9% (72/116), P < 0.001). Factors associated with these increments could not be adequately modelled. CONCLUSIONS: The change to 2020 EUCAST criteria might be associated with increased odds of meropenem prescription for the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections stressing the need of prescribers' education and the importance of antibiotic stewardship interventions.


Assuntos
Infecções por Pseudomonas , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Hospitais , Humanos , Meropeném/uso terapêutico , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Prescrições , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/microbiologia , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Estudos Retrospectivos
8.
BMJ ; 374: n2132, 2021 09 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34548312

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether point-of care procalcitonin and lung ultrasonography can safely reduce unnecessary antibiotic treatment in patients with lower respiratory tract infections in primary care. DESIGN: Three group, pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial from September 2018 to March 2020. SETTING: 60 Swiss general practices. PARTICIPANTS: One general practitioner per practice was included. General practitioners screen all patients with acute cough; patients with clinical pneumonia were included. INTERVENTIONS: Randomisation in a 1:1:1 of general practitioners to either antibiotics guided by sequential procalcitonin and lung ultrasonography point-of-care tests (UltraPro; n=152), procalcitonin guided antibiotics (n=195), or usual care (n=122). MAIN OUTCOMES: Primary outcome was proportion of patients in each group prescribed an antibiotic by day 28. Secondary outcomes included duration of restricted activities due to lower respiratory tract infection within 14 days. RESULTS: 60 general practitioners included 469 patients (median age 53 years (interquartile range 38-66); 278 (59%) were female). Probability of antibiotic prescription at day 28 was lower in the procalcitonin group than in the usual care group (0.40 v 0.70, cluster corrected difference -0.26 (95% confidence interval -0.41 to -0.10)). No significant difference was seen between UltraPro and procalcitonin groups (0.41 v 0.40, -0.03 (-0.17 to 0.12)). The median number of days with restricted activities by day 14 was 4 days in the procalcitonin group and 3 days in the usual care group (difference 1 day (95% confidence interval -0.23 to 2.32); hazard ratio 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.58 to 0.97)), which did not prove non-inferiority. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with usual care, point-of-care procalcitonin led to a 26% absolute reduction in the probability of 28 day antibiotic prescription without affecting patients' safety. Point-of-care lung ultrasonography did not further reduce antibiotic prescription, although a potential added value cannot be excluded, owing to the wide confidence intervals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03191071.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Testes Imediatos , Pró-Calcitonina/sangue , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Biomarcadores/análise , Análise por Conglomerados , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Medicina Geral , Humanos , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos
9.
PLoS One ; 15(11): e0240781, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33186355

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study aims to describe the epidemiology of COVID-19 patients in a Swiss university hospital. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included all adult patients hospitalized with a laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection from March 1 to March 25, 2020. We extracted data from electronic health records. The primary outcome was the need to mechanical ventilation at day 14. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify risk factors for mechanical ventilation. Follow-up was of at least 14 days. RESULTS: 145 patients were included in the multivariate model, of whom 36 (24.8%) needed mechanical ventilation at 14 days. The median time from symptoms onset to mechanical ventilation was 9·5 days (IQR 7.00, 12.75). Multivariable regression showed increased odds of mechanical ventilation with age (OR 1.09 per year, 95% CI 1.03-1.16, p = 0.002), in males (OR 6.99, 95% CI 1.68-29.03, p = 0.007), in patients who presented with a qSOFA score ≥2 (OR 7.24, 95% CI 1.64-32.03, p = 0.009), with bilateral infiltrate (OR 18.92, 3.94-98.23, p<0.001) or with a CRP of 40 mg/l or greater (OR 5.44, 1.18-25.25; p = 0.030) on admission. Patients with more than seven days of symptoms on admission had decreased odds of mechanical ventilation (0.087, 95% CI 0.02-0.38, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study gives some insight in the epidemiology and clinical course of patients admitted in a European tertiary hospital with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Age, male sex, high qSOFA score, CRP of 40 mg/l or greater and a bilateral radiological infiltrate could help clinicians identify patients at high risk for mechanical ventilation.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Hospitalização , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Suíça , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Adulto Jovem
10.
BMC Infect Dis ; 20(1): 767, 2020 Oct 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33069221

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ureaplasma urealyticum is an intra-cellular bacterium frequently found colonizing the genital tract. Known complications include localized infections, which can result in premature deliveries. Septic arthritis due to U. urealyticum in healthy patients is exceptionally rare, although opportunistic septic arthritis in agammaglobulinemic patients have been reported. However, there are no reports of septic arthritis due to U. urealyticum following caesarean section or in the post-partum period. CASE PRESENTATION: A 38-year-old immunocompetent woman presented with severe right shoulder pain, 1 month following emergency caesarean section at 26 weeks of gestation for pre-eclampsia and spontaneous placental disruption with an uncomplicated post-operative recovery. Our suspicion of septic arthritis was confirmed with abundant pus following arthrotomy by a delto-pectoral approach. Awaiting culture results, empirical antibiotic treatment with intravenous amoxicilline and clavulanic acid was initiated. In spite of sterile cultures, clinical evolution was unfavorable with persistent pain, inflammation and purulent drainage, requiring two additional surgical débridement and lavage procedures. The 16S ribosomal RNA PCR of the purulent liquid was positive for U. urealyticum at 2.95 × 106 copies/ml, specific cultures inoculated a posteriori were positive for U. urealyticum. Levofloxacin and azithromycine antibiotherapy was initiated. Susceptibility testing showed an intermediate sensibility to ciprofloxacin and clarithromycin. The strain was susceptible to doxycycline. Following cessation of breastfeeding, we started antibiotic treatment with doxycycline for 4 weeks. The subsequent course was favorable with an excellent functional and biological outcome. CONCLUSIONS: We report the first case of septic arthritis due to U. urealyticum after caesarean section. We hypothesize that the breach of the genital mucosal barrier during the caesarean section led to hematogenous spread resulting in purulent septic arthritis. The initial beta-lactam based antibiotic treatment, initiated for a purulent arthritis, did not provide coverage for cell wall deficient organisms. Detection of 16S rRNA allowed for a correct microbiological diagnosis in a patient with an unexpected clinical course.


Assuntos
Artrite Infecciosa/microbiologia , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Ombro/microbiologia , Infecções por Ureaplasma/diagnóstico , Ureaplasma urealyticum/genética , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Infecciosa/tratamento farmacológico , Doxiciclina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Gravidez , Nascimento Prematuro , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Resultado do Tratamento , Infecções por Ureaplasma/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Ureaplasma/microbiologia , Ureaplasma urealyticum/isolamento & purificação , Sistema Urogenital/microbiologia
13.
Rev Med Suisse ; 16(692): 917-923, 2020 May 06.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32374537

RESUMO

Since its emergence in December 2019, scientific knowledge about the SARS-CoV-2 virus has evolved rapidly but, due to the complexity and novelty of this infection and its political and economic stakes, much remains to be clarified. Thousands of studies have already been published and scientific research is constantly evolving. In this multitude of information, we offer an update of the knowledge currently available. A limitation of the propagation, the understanding of the functioning of the virus and its clinical manifestations, the administration of specific treatments, rapid and reliable diagnostic tools are the basis of the fight against this germ, which is still little known today.


Depuis son apparition en Décembre 2019, les connaissances scientifiques concernant le virus SARS-CoV-2 ont rapidement évolués mais, en raison de la complexité et nouveauté de cette infection et de ses enjeux politiques et économiques, encore beaucoup reste à clarifier. Des milliers d'études ont déjà été publiés et la recherche scientifique est en constante évolution. Dans cette multitude d'informations, nous proposons une mise à jour des connaissances actuellement disponibles. Une limitation de la propagation, la compréhension du fonctionnement du virus et de ses manifestations cliniques, l'administration de traitements spécifiques et des outils diagnostiques rapides et fiables, sont à la base de la lutte contre ce germe à présent encore méconnu.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Humanos , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , SARS-CoV-2
14.
Rev Med Suisse ; 16(690): 732-738, 2020 Apr 15.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32301307

RESUMO

Skin infections are a frequent cause of consultation, yet the diagnosis can be challenging for physicians. Microbiological documentation is rare, and empiric antibiotic regimens should cover the most commonly identified bacteria, i.e. streptococci Staphylococcus aureus. Other pathogens should be considered in case of immunosuppression or certain exposures. Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a severe but rare infection. Early surgical management in parallel with antibiotics is the cornerstone of treatment. Despite the high incidence of these infections, little progress has been made in their management and some areas of uncertainty exist, especially regarding the optimal duration of treatment, the prevention of recurrences and the use of polyclonal immunoglobulins for NF. This article reviews the main aspects of diagnosis and treatment of these infections.


Les infections de la peau sont fréquentes mais leur diagnostic peut représenter un défi pour le clinicien. La documentation de l'étiologie microbiologique est rare et le traitement empirique doit couvrir les germes fréquents, notamment Streptococcus spp. et Staphylococcus aureus. Des bactéries inhabituelles peuvent être retrouvées lors d'immunosuppression ou exposition spéciale. La fasciite nécrosante (FN) est une infection sévère mais rare, dont le traitement repose sur la chirurgie rapide et l'antibiothérapie. Malgré leur fréquence, peu de progrès ont été réalisés dans la prise en charge de ces infections et des incertitudes persistent par rapport à la durée optimale de traitement, la prophylaxie pour les récurrences ou l'utilité des immunoglobulines polyclonales intraveineuses pour la FN. Cet article aborde les aspects diagnostiques et thérapeutiques de ces infections.


Assuntos
Dermatopatias Infecciosas/diagnóstico , Dermatopatias Infecciosas/terapia , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/diagnóstico , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/terapia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Fasciite Necrosante/tratamento farmacológico , Fasciite Necrosante/microbiologia , Humanos , Imunoglobulinas/uso terapêutico , Dermatopatias Infecciosas/microbiologia , Dermatopatias Infecciosas/cirurgia , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/microbiologia , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/cirurgia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos
15.
BMC Pulm Med ; 19(1): 143, 2019 Aug 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31387559

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A minority of patients presenting with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) to their general practitioner (GP) have community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and require antibiotic therapy. Identifying them is challenging, because of overlapping symptomatology and low diagnostic performance of chest X-ray. Procalcitonin (PCT) can be safely used to decide on antibiotic prescription in patients with LRTI. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is effective in detecting lung consolidation in pneumonia and might compensate for the lack of specificity of PCT. We hypothesize that combining PCT and LUS, available as point-of care tests (POCT), might reduce antibiotic prescription in LRTIs without impacting patient safety in the primary care setting. METHODS: This is a three-arm pragmatic cluster randomized controlled clinical trial. GPs are randomized either to PCT and LUS-guided antibiotic therapy or to PCT only-guided therapy or to usual care. Consecutive adult patients with an acute cough due to a respiratory infection will be screened and included if they present a clinical pneumonia as defined by European guidelines. Exclusion criteria are previous antibiotics for the current episode, working diagnosis of sinusitis, severe underlying lung disease, severe immunosuppression, hospital admission, pregnancy, inability to provide informed consent and unavailability of the GP. Patients will fill in a 28 day-symptom diary and will be contacted by phone on days 7 and 28. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients prescribed any antibiotic up to day 28. Secondary outcomes include clinical failure by day 7 (death, admission to hospital, absence of amelioration or worsening of relevant symptoms) and by day 28, duration of restricted daily activities, episode duration as defined by symptom score, number of medical visits, number of days with side effects due to antibiotics and a composite outcome combining death, admission to hospital and complications due to LRTI by day 28. An evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and of processes in the clinic using a mixed qualitative and quantitative approach will also be conducted. DISCUSSION: Our intervention targets only patients with clinically suspected CAP who have a higher pretest probability of definite pneumonia. The intervention will not substitute clinical assessment but completes it by introducing new easy-to-perform tests. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered on the 19th of June 2017 on the clinicaltrials.gov registry using reference number; NCT03191071 .


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Testes Imediatos , Pró-Calcitonina/sangue , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Biomarcadores/sangue , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/diagnóstico por imagem , Hospitalização , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Seleção de Pacientes , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Pragmáticos como Assunto , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia
16.
BMJ Open ; 8(6): e019806, 2018 06 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29895647

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of missed opportunities (MOs) among patients newly diagnosed with HIV, risk factors for presenting MOs and the association between MOs and late presentation (LP) to care. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: HIV outpatient clinic at a Swiss tertiary hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥18 years newly presenting for HIV care between 2010 and 2015. MEASURES: Number of medical visits, up to 5 years preceding HIV diagnosis, at which HIV testing had been indicated, according to Swiss HIV testing recommendations. A visit at which testing was indicated but not performed was considered an MO for HIV testing. RESULTS: Complete records were available for all 201 new patients of whom 51% were male and 33% from sub-Saharan Africa. Thirty patients (15%) presented with acute HIV infection while 119 patients (59%) were LPs (CD4 counts <350 cells/mm3 at diagnosis). Ninety-four patients (47%) had presented at least one MO, of whom 44 (47%) had multiple MOs. MOs were more frequent among individuals from sub-Saharan Africa, men who have sex with men and patients under follow-up for chronic disease. MOs were less frequent in LPs than non-LPs (42.5% vs 57.5%, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: At our centre, 47% of patients presented at least one MO. While our LP rate was higher than the national figure of 49.8%, LPs were less likely to experience MOs, suggesting that these patients were diagnosed late through presenting late, rather than through being failed by our hospital. We conclude that, in addition to optimising provider-initiated testing, access to testing must be improved among patients who are unaware that they are at HIV risk and who do not seek healthcare.


Assuntos
Diagnóstico Tardio/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Homossexualidade Masculina/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , África Subsaariana/etnologia , Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/etnologia , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Suíça , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...